When thinking about my inner conflicts, one in particular stands out above the rest: self-centeredness. For as long as I can remember, I have struggled with the tendency to act selfishly and to think of my own desires before the needs of others. Consequently, almost every situation concerning my self-centeredness results in negative aspects. I have realized this problem and the need to correct it, but I fear that this self-centeredness is one of my major flaws that will continually need to be conquered over the course of my life.
Selfish acts occur daily throughout the world; humanity is not perfect, so its flaws are part of every day life. Therefore, my self-centeredness is also part of every day life. One of the instances in which this conflict is present is in my inability to listen to others’ problems for long periods of time. Sometimes I find myself mentally dozing when I am supposed to be listening to people talk. Other times, I will start thinking on tangents that pop into my mind when the conversation is relative. It is not that I am reluctant to hear what people have to say, but occasionally I get tired of my friends talking at me instead of with me. I feel guilty whenever I eventually make it back to the present topic, but only because I deluded the other person into thinking I was listening, not because I was thinking on my own train of thought instead.
Another instance of my self-centeredness is seen in my habit to act stingy. When I was younger, I was reluctant to share anything with anybody unless it was originally meant to be shared, like a game. I had problems with allowing others to take things that were meant for myself, such as my food and crayons. As I got older, I learned to control the selfishness to an extent, but I still feel like I face complications with it today. Whenever I need to share with anybody, whether it be my snacks, books, or even time, I am hesitant to do so. Though I have fewer issues with lending my belongings, I would rather keep them to myself.
This ever-present conflict within myself has always been there, and may never completely go away. However, over time I have learned that in order to be the best person that I can, I must show kindness and understanding to the world. My propensity towards self-centeredness hinders this goodness, so I must overcome the internal conflict to let my love for others shine.
One outer conflict that I encountered recently has occurred within my church, Hillcrest, over the past couple years. The church, a Christian disciples church, divided into two sides pitted against each other. One side, mostly made up of the younger generation, called for change within the church. They wanted to install new aspects to services, like new music, and to rid the services of outdated and unnecessary practices in order to entice new members to join the aging population. The opposing side, comprised of traditionalists, wanted everything to stay the same within the church, and did not want any new music or practices to be added.
Unfortunately, whenever members of the two sides were both elected to the church board, the real conflict arose. The church leaders could not make any concrete decisions because their ideas were so vastly different. Weekly meetings resulted in yelling most of the time, reducing some patrons to tears. The conflict reached a breaking point whenever members started to leave Hillcrest. Starting with the choir director, church members who had attended for decades switched to different congregations across the city.
As over half of Hillcrest’s membership departed indefinitely, the revolutionary members still called for change. Many did not like the way the pastor relayed his sermons because they were “boring” and “unrelatable.” As a result, the pastor decided to leave the church and find a new pulpit. Many members followed him, again reducing attendees by half. The church was left shattered, with only a meager fifty members remaining. Their tithes were barely enough to keep the large building running, let alone to pay for the guest preachers to come very week. Everyone had to contribute more time to organizing Hillcrest as a result. Each member was required to give their services in instances of singing, custodial duties, committee attendance, and new ideas.
The small version of Hillcrest continued for almost a year barely on its feet. Finally, candidates for new pastors were reviewed and narrowed down to one. Pastor Cox was hired to the position of pastor, and the church again had firm leadership to follow. The new pastor even brought about twenty new members with him, adding more stability to the rocked congregation. To the present day, Hillcrest is still working out new details for services and events with the pastor, but it is on the upward swing at last.
One thing I did not understand throughout the revival of Hillcrest was the way in which the two opposing sides handled each other. They were all Christians, all followers of Jesus. One thing we are supposed to do as Disciples of Christ is respect one another and treat others as we want to be treated. Yelling in each other’s faces and calling people names obviously does not fit under this category. The people involved in the conflict at the original meetings were also all adults. The lack of maturity and composure in the setting exposed a great concern for society. It got me thinking, if Christians, people who represent honesty, charity, and consideration for the world, cannot cooperate and exhibit their required traits of peace, how can the rest of the world cooperate? There has to be some way that the world can resolve its outer conflicts without resorting to base violence and disrespect to humanity, but it has not yet been found. The goal, therefore, in order for the world at large to coincide peacefully, must be to discover a means of cooperation that allows for every voice to be heard without loosing the condition of tranquility.